To fight climate change, all communications must be curated and censored to permit only official corporate, government and academic statement to be made. As you know, experts said the Covid-19 vaccine would stop the spread of Covid-19 infections – questioning that was forbidden – even thought it turned out the vaccines did not stop the spread of Covid-19.
We are at the end stage of democracy where dissenting perspectives will be shut down and we must embrace censorship to save the climate. Questioning the science or the proposed solutions – is harmful. You will come around to support that we must ban all pets (dogs and cats) as they consume 25% of meat produced in the U.S. It’s just science.
Where once climate deniers would outright reject climate change as a hoax or scam, or claim that humans were not responsible for it, many are now shifting to a different approach, one which attempts to undermine climate science, cast doubt on climate solutions and even claim global warming will be beneficial at best, harmless at worst. Continue reading
The past five years have seen a “startling” rise in this “new denial,” according to a CCDH analysis published Tuesday, which also suggests this shift in narrative could also be helping YouTube video creators circumvent the social media company’s ban on monetizing climate denial.
Related – This week, the media is running coordinated stories that say – this is not a joke – that thinking for yourself is irresponsible.
- Media: Don’t do your own research, rely on experts – Social Panic (coldstreams.com)
- Media: Rely on Appeal to Authority to vet information – Social Panic (coldstreams.com)
There were more stories this week, at different publications, saying the same thing: thinking for yourself is harmful.
Hilariously, the “free press” goes all in on supporting censorship.
