To change the climate we must reduce “inequality”:
They suggest a range of policy interventions, such as urban planning to include bus and bike lanes and pedestrian-friendly routes, progressive taxation rates on wealth and income, and employer-subsidized low-carbon meal options.
Reducing inequality is essential in tackling climate crisis, researchers argue
From others, we must
- ban eating meat
- ban eating milk, ice cream, cream, yogurt and cheese
- ban all pets and dogs (they consume 25% of meat in the U.S.)
- Because only people with money can afford the costs of their proposed climate mitigations, we need to ban having money (try not to think about that)
- Make car ownership so expensive, only the elite can travel.
- Move everyone into dense cities, ban living outside cities (or make it so expensive that only the elite can do that)
- ban air travel
- ban the posting or sharing of critical comments of these proposals
- Turn over everything to a government elite that decides what we can eat, where we can live, when or if we can travel, and when we can wash our clothes
To fight the ClimateCrisis we must live in a dystopian future of authoritarian and totalitarian government, and end democracy itself, because the people do not support this.
Lacking political support, some argue that democracy is outdated – and we should defer to a technocratic elite of central committees that determine precisely what each of us needs. There is a word for this but gosh, I can’t think of what we might call such a system …
Our current form of governments and society, worldwide, are awful – it’s just Science and proven by the data!
