No: Is the housing shortage due to “Boomers” not downsizing?
"Boomers" age 65+ are already living in smaller homes, per data, and this is largely unchanged in 25 years.
Opinion: Practicing Factfulness based on data.
"Boomers" age 65+ are already living in smaller homes, per data, and this is largely unchanged in 25 years.
Home ownership by age group has remained remarkably constant over decades, contrary to some recent media memes.
The U.S. population may shrink, slightly in 2025, the first time that has ever happened.
The largest change is in the net worth of the top 1% and then the top 0.1%.
Due to an "inheritance glut" and other changes, pianos are now free, 8-10 place "fine China" place settings sell for $50, and few want Grandma's "hutch".
Should we tax "unused rooms"? And what is a unused room?
"Boomers" are supposed to downsize to smaller homes. But the US has not built many smaller homes in most of the past 50 years.
Economy: Housing problems are all due to "boomers" because they are not moving to smaller homes. Reality: The US has not built smaller homes for 50 years.
If only someone would have mentioned what would happen with a shrinking fertility rate ...