{"id":9251,"date":"2019-12-01T23:56:19","date_gmt":"2019-12-01T23:56:19","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/socialpanic.org\/?p=9251"},"modified":"2019-12-01T23:56:19","modified_gmt":"2019-12-01T23:56:19","slug":"climate-communications-extreme-statements-by-environmental-activists-undermine-environmental-progress","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/coldstreams.com\/social\/2019\/12\/01\/climate-communications-extreme-statements-by-environmental-activists-undermine-environmental-progress\/","title":{"rendered":"Climate communications: &#8220;extreme statements by environmental activists undermine environmental progress&#8221;"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>On the topic and tactics of climate change propaganda messaging becoming Never Cry Wolf:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>Climate change is real but it&#8217;s not the end of the world. And increasingly extreme statements by activists undermine environmental progress, say climate scientists.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Source: <em><a href=\"https:\/\/www.forbes.com\/sites\/michaelshellenberger\/2019\/11\/25\/why-everything-they-say-about-climate-change-is-wrong\/\">Why Apocalyptic Claims About Climate Change Are Wrong<\/a><\/em><\/p>\n<p>The author is the found of Environmental Progress and was selected by Time Magazine as a &#8220;Hero of the Environment&#8221; and recipient of the 2008 &#8220;Green Book Award&#8221;. He is noted as an environmentalist and advocate for social justice. However, his <a href=\"https:\/\/environmentalprogress.org\/who-we-are\">organization<\/a> is strongly pro-nuclear energy and accuse the organization of lobbying for the nuclear industry. The godfather of climate change, NASA&#8217;s now retired Dr. James Hansen, also supports the expansion and use of nuclear power to address CO2 emissions.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Standard Disclaimer Applies: How to Do Climate Communications \u2013 Never Cry Wolf<br \/>\n<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>As <a href=\"https:\/\/coldstreams.com\/social\/2019\/09\/21\/climate-communications-climate-media-coverage-lacks-facts-say-researchers\/\">I previously wrote<\/a><\/p>\n<blockquote><p>The Nature Conservancy should focus on facts of atmospheric CO2 levels rising, land and sea surface temperature anomalies, ice pack changes, ocean Ph and sea level change (IPCC Synthesis Report, Figure SPM.1) \u2013 as reported by reputable scientific bodies, but they did not. Instead they went straight for hyperbole and making untrue claims to promote fear and hysteria.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/coldstreams.com\/social\/2019\/10\/17\/climate-communications-and-journalismish-crisis-emergency-deniers-and-the-language-of-propaganda-in-the-guardian\/\">or<\/a><\/p>\n<blockquote><p>Stick with the facts of CO2 rising, sea level ice and temperature changes, ice mass changes or risk tuning all of us out. Shrill terminology designed to create emotional outrage and responses is a total turn off.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/coldstreams.com\/social\/2019\/10\/08\/climate-communications-professor-thinks-climate-communications-should-be-even-more-hysterical\/\">and<\/a><\/p>\n<blockquote><p><em>The facts are sufficient.<\/em> The impacts of untrue propaganda hysteria, on the other hand, are to turn off the target completely. <strong><em>We have learned nothing from the parable of the boy who repeatedly cried Wolf!<\/em><\/strong><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>The propaganda messaging methods in use are leading to public opinions that are not based in facts, logic or evidence. In the U.S. 51% of those aged 18-34 believe humanity may become extinct within 10-15 years, even though there is zero evidence to support such a conclusion. This disconnect between belief and reality risks the potential for major backlash against taking action to reduce CO2-equivalent effects on climate.<\/p>\n<p>Some suggest focusing on solutions and opportunities \u2013 instead of unrealistic, dystopian catastrophes designed primarily as click-bait \u2013 would be a more effective and positive way forward for climate communications. Instead, we get intense negativity \u2013 and falsehoods \u2013 that have led to children and adults to seek mental health treatment for induced anxiety.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Personal Notes on Climate Realism<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>We are taking direct actions to reduce our CO2-equivalent emissions. In late 2019, we are spending $18,000 (before credits) to install a solar PV array that will reduce our home&#8217;s annual grid-provided electricity to net zero (likely less). Our utility generates 56% of its electricity by burning coal and 14% by burning natural gas (about half the emissions of coal). Solar PV directly cuts our portion of those GHG emissions to zero.<\/p>\n<p>We are spending over $5,000 to upgrade 40 year old R-19 attic insulation (which has settled such that it is less than that) to R-49 building code standards. For an all electric house, we currently use 1\/3d the amount of electricity of similar homes. We heat using locally sourced wood pellets and our home is cold most every winter day. I drive a Honda Fit averaging about 42 mpg. While spending an amount similar to a low end electric vehicle, our solar and attic upgrades we will have a far greater reduction in CO2 emissions than buying an EV. About half of an EV&#8217;s lifetime CO2 emissions occur during its manufacturing and if you live where your electricity is generated by burning coal, your overall CO2 emissions reductions are small. While EVs will generally reduce CO2 emissions, for many they are primarily a virtue signaling device (<a href=\"https:\/\/www.thedrive.com\/news\/26637\/americans-cite-range-anxiety-cost-as-largest-barriers-for-new-ev-purchases-study\">a survey by Volvo<\/a> found about 75% of purchasers said this, and selected an EV because paradoxically it \u201chelps them to feel better about making less environmentally conscious decisions in \u201cother areas of life.\u201d.)<\/p>\n<p>I post this at the end of each climate communications post because merely asking any questions about climate change results in being called a climate denier or a Nazi.<\/p>\n<p>Call me a climate realist but don&#8217;t call me a denier or a Nazi.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>&#8220;Climate change is real but it&#8217;s not the end of the world. And increasingly extreme statements by activists undermine environmental progress, say climate scientists.&#8221; &#8211; another post in our continuing look at poorly done climate communications tactics that are leading many to ignore the climate topic altogether.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[11],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-9251","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-climate-communications"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/coldstreams.com\/social\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9251","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/coldstreams.com\/social\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/coldstreams.com\/social\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/coldstreams.com\/social\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/coldstreams.com\/social\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=9251"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/coldstreams.com\/social\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9251\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/coldstreams.com\/social\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=9251"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/coldstreams.com\/social\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=9251"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/coldstreams.com\/social\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=9251"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}