How Two Hoaxes Took Down Journalistic Integrity
A catch up review of the 2006 Duke lacrosse team rape hoax story, and the 2013 UVA rape hoax and the aftermath.
A catch up review of the 2006 Duke lacrosse team rape hoax story, and the 2013 UVA rape hoax and the aftermath.
“Warnings issued as millions in 13 states told to avoid windows for 12 hours”
“A previous version of this story included a summary that does not reflect the gravity of the incident, thereby breaching the editorial standards we require for all our reporting”
The report’s text refutes the headline. Sigh.
That claim is not true. Why did they make up this false headline?
More fake news about retirements savings – which excludes most all of the assets many people have for retirement. Typical.
Bad sentence structure like the item shown in this post, is remarkably common.
Just change the Y-Axis or cherry pick the data – a cheap trick the whole family can enjoy!
Most Americans have no money left over after the spend and save the remaining 🙂
Use a “cumulative” count rather than an incidence rate.